CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/insertion/k-insertion/
normalized-2-insertions-3-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/insertion/k-insertion/
normalized-2-insertions-3-3.xml
MD5SUM9b2dd82651de0f42341e7b0a0468449b
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.06199
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables37
Number of constraints72
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size3
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension72
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090977UNSAT 0.06199 0.0679861
bpsolver 2008-06-271090981UNSAT 0.089985 0.0944479
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090976UNSAT 0.096984 0.102416
cpHydra k_401090993UNSAT 0.102983 0.109142
cpHydra k_101090992UNSAT 0.103983 0.108683
casper zito1090989UNSAT 0.106983 0.115094
casper zao1090988UNSAT 0.112981 0.119519
Mistral-option 1.3141090986UNSAT 0.138978 0.145625
Mistral-prime 1.3131090987UNSAT 0.182971 0.189074
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105668UNSAT 0.378941 0.415138
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090979UNSAT 0.6489 0.697526
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090980UNSAT 0.662899 0.690687
galac M1090984UNSAT 0.667898 0.698671
galac E1090985UNSAT 0.805877 0.832646
Abscon 112v4 AC1090990UNSAT 1.06284 1.09406
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090983UNSAT 1.07883 1.10143
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090991UNSAT 1.09283 1.1556
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090982UNSAT 1.15182 1.20583
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090975UNSAT 1.17082 1.20574
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090978UNSAT 1.43378 1.47077
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090974? (TO) 1800.04 1816.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090973? (TO) 1800.07 1817.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: