CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-5-fullins-3-6.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-5-fullins-3-6.xml
MD5SUM28b7e475c71c9833073a377e192d6f34
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.033994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables154
Number of constraints792
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size6
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension792
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090724UNSAT 0.033994 0.041238
Mistral-option 1.3141090734UNSAT 0.033994 0.0342719
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090725UNSAT 0.034994 0.040952
Mistral-prime 1.3131090735UNSAT 0.036994 0.041806
cpHydra k_101090740UNSAT 0.045992 0.048661
cpHydra k_401090741UNSAT 0.047992 0.0528899
casper zito1090737UNSAT 0.086986 0.094272
casper zao1090736UNSAT 0.116982 0.118262
bpsolver 2008-06-271090729UNSAT 0.130979 0.130197
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105664UNSAT 0.728889 0.786982
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090739UNSAT 1.05984 1.09063
Abscon 112v4 AC1090738UNSAT 1.06984 1.09464
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090730UNSAT 1.14982 1.209
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090728UNSAT 1.19382 1.34221
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090731UNSAT 1.20881 1.25402
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090727UNSAT 1.27881 1.41965
galac E1090733UNSAT 1.3088 1.36227
galac M1090732UNSAT 1.35479 1.42227
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090723UNSAT 1.81672 1.85602
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090726UNSAT 2.76658 2.80531
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090722? (TO) 1800.02 1809.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090721? (TO) 1800.05 1808.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: