CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-3-fullins-4-6.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/insertion/full-insertion/
normalized-3-fullins-4-6.xml
MD5SUM2550f96fb44e3f12a4ac823881cfa598
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.51177
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables405
Number of constraints3524
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size6
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3524
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090619UNSAT 1.51177 1.53364
Mistral-prime 1.3131090630UNSAT 1.65775 1.67636
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090626UNSAT 2.46662 2.5033
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090625UNSAT 2.70259 2.77779
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090623UNSAT 2.92355 3.04324
galac E1090628UNSAT 4.06538 4.14326
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090622UNSAT 4.54131 4.64965
galac M1090627UNSAT 4.97924 5.04697
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105661UNSAT 5.15421 5.21777
Mistral-option 1.3141090629UNSAT 5.36418 5.41145
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090620UNSAT 5.53216 5.53607
cpHydra k_101090635UNSAT 9.43856 9.58554
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090621UNSAT 13.5179 13.6551
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090634UNSAT 17.7313 17.9768
Abscon 112v4 AC1090633UNSAT 18.4572 18.6349
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090618UNSAT 32.908 33.2643
cpHydra k_401090636UNSAT 46.106 46.8504
casper zao1090631UNSAT 47.1938 47.5917
casper zito1090632UNSAT 79.4959 80.2367
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090617? (TO) 1800.04 1811.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090616? (TO) 1800.05 1814.42
bpsolver 2008-06-271090624? (TO) 1800.08 1815.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: