CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/sgb/
miles/normalized-miles1000-40.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/sgb/
miles/normalized-miles1000-40.xml
MD5SUM387828521bc4fe15e150bef49f8dbe6b
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.111982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables128
Number of constraints3216
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size40
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3216
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090095UNSAT 0.111982 0.114589
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090094UNSAT 0.112981 0.114481
cpHydra k_101090110UNSAT 0.125979 0.127918
Mistral-option 1.3141090104UNSAT 0.12598 0.13328
Mistral-prime 1.3131090105UNSAT 0.12698 0.138156
cpHydra k_401090111UNSAT 0.132979 0.139459
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090101UNSAT 2.22866 2.30418
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090100UNSAT 2.40663 2.471
galac E1090103? (MO) 1612.27 1617.81
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090092? (TO) 1800.01 1813.12
bpsolver 2008-06-271090099? (TO) 1800.03 1808.51
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090098? (TO) 1800.04 1809.53
galac M1090102? (TO) 1800.05 1811.51
casper zao1090106? (TO) 1800.07 1808.41
casper zito1090107? (TO) 1800.07 1811.81
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090097? (TO) 1800.07 1810.63
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090091? (TO) 1800.09 1807.92
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090093? (TO) 1800.09 1812.82
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105769? (TO) 1800.11 1810.51
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090109? (TO) 1800.13 1801.93
Abscon 112v4 AC1090108? (TO) 1800.16 1809.97
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090096? (TO) 1800.18 1806.05

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: