CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/sgb/
queen/normalized-queen8-12-10.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/sgb/
queen/normalized-queen8-12-10.xml
MD5SUM819f724ab904e5403549587a113ad0d6
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.050992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables96
Number of constraints1368
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension1368
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131089895UNSAT 0.050992 0.0582579
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089885UNSAT 0.051991 0.053238
Mistral-option 1.3141089894UNSAT 0.051991 0.0581269
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089884UNSAT 0.052991 0.053935
cpHydra k_401089901UNSAT 0.06199 0.0650861
cpHydra k_101089900UNSAT 0.06299 0.0601881
bpsolver 2008-06-271089889UNSAT 0.194969 0.20638
Abscon 112v4 AC1089898UNSAT 1.18282 1.26004
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089899UNSAT 1.18682 1.20232
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089891UNSAT 1.36579 1.4196
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089890UNSAT 1.66674 1.735
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089888UNSAT 6.03708 6.21359
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089887UNSAT 6.16206 6.3164
galac M1089892UNSAT 105.644 106.719
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105783UNSAT 169.906 171.294
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089883UNSAT 1723.99 1732.7
casper zao1089896? (TO) 1800.02 1809.51
galac E1089893? (TO) 1800.04 1808.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089881? (TO) 1800.05 1802.22
casper zito1089897? (TO) 1800.05 1802.01
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089882? (TO) 1800.07 1802.12
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089886? (TO) 1800.14 1813.57

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: