CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-5/
normalized-lei450-05a-04.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-5/
normalized-lei450-05a-04.xml
MD5SUM9b02652f068c21dada85a83d70028d36
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.214967
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints5714
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension5714
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141089810UNSAT 0.214967 0.213749
Mistral-prime 1.3131089811UNSAT 0.221965 0.228267
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089800UNSAT 0.222965 0.230465
cpHydra k_101089816UNSAT 0.222965 0.225668
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089801UNSAT 0.225964 0.235096
cpHydra k_401089817UNSAT 0.235964 0.24417
bpsolver 2008-06-271089805UNSAT 0.805876 0.81276
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105702UNSAT 1.41578 1.47215
casper zao1089812UNSAT 1.54177 1.54408
casper zito1089813UNSAT 1.75773 1.77515
Abscon 112v4 AC1089814UNSAT 2.07768 2.14905
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089804UNSAT 2.11468 2.23023
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089815UNSAT 2.15867 2.21031
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089803UNSAT 2.66459 2.73156
galac E1089809UNSAT 2.88356 2.93732
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089806UNSAT 2.92255 2.98045
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089807UNSAT 2.95255 2.97407
galac M1089808UNSAT 3.08953 3.14508
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089802UNSAT 5.77212 5.8531
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089799UNSAT 9.33658 9.45724
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089797? (TO) 1800.03 1817.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089798? (TO) 1800.03 1814.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: