CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-15/
normalized-lei450-15c-14.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-15/
normalized-lei450-15c-14.xml
MD5SUM2bd39fc824a9aa9825590a76be10fd6c
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.618905
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints16680
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size14
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension16680
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141089705UNSAT 0.618905 0.620643
Mistral-prime 1.3131089706UNSAT 0.618905 0.621859
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089695UNSAT 0.676896 0.690607
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089696UNSAT 0.678895 0.688512
cpHydra k_101089711UNSAT 0.680896 0.690851
cpHydra k_401089712UNSAT 0.701893 0.713721
bpsolver 2008-06-271089700UNSAT 2.27365 2.28878
Abscon 112v4 AC1089709UNSAT 4.55431 4.64848
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089710UNSAT 4.63529 4.716
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089702UNSAT 7.2369 7.3696
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089701UNSAT 7.46686 7.52053
casper zao1089707? (TO) 1800.01 1808.41
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089699? (TO) 1800.03 1812.33
galac M1089703? (TO) 1800.04 1803.41
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089692? (TO) 1800.05 1800.73
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089694? (TO) 1800.05 1808.72
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089698? (TO) 1800.05 1810.22
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105688? (TO) 1800.07 1807.61
galac E1089704? (TO) 1800.08 1810.81
casper zito1089708? (TO) 1800.08 1816.91
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089693? (TO) 1800.11 1809.43
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089697? (TO) 1800.2 1800.2

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: