CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25b-24.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25b-24.xml
MD5SUM1a83ac4e698f7d5e998b86838d2a31c5
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.298953
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints8263
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size24
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension8263
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089317UNSAT 0.298953 0.30053
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089318UNSAT 0.298954 0.299859
Mistral-prime 1.3131089328UNSAT 0.31695 0.328537
Mistral-option 1.3141089327UNSAT 0.318951 0.326139
cpHydra k_101089333UNSAT 0.32495 0.330224
cpHydra k_401089334UNSAT 0.325949 0.330853
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089332UNSAT 2.6206 2.66182
Abscon 112v4 AC1089331UNSAT 2.92755 2.98785
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089324UNSAT 4.02739 4.08878
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089323UNSAT 4.08438 4.14467
galac M1089325? (TO) 1800.01 1816.91
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089321? (TO) 1800.02 1809.03
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089315? (TO) 1800.03 1801.12
casper zao1089329? (TO) 1800.03 1812.51
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089316? (TO) 1800.03 1800.82
bpsolver 2008-06-271089322? (TO) 1800.06 1801.71
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089320? (TO) 1800.07 1804.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089314? (TO) 1800.08 1803.12
galac E1089326? (TO) 1800.09 1802.61
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105697? (TO) 1800.11 1810.61
casper zito1089330? (TO) 1800.11 1815.21
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089319? (TO) 1800.14 1807.61

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: