CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-2-20.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-2-20.xml
MD5SUM4a2ea02751f7df9d0bb61a77d9049c7d
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.510921
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables645
Number of constraints13979
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension13979
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131088992UNSAT 0.510921 0.512109
cpHydra k_101088997UNSAT 0.520919 0.520341
cpHydra k_401088998UNSAT 0.52092 0.523566
Mistral-option 1.3141088991UNSAT 0.529919 0.532145
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088982UNSAT 0.534917 0.546078
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088981UNSAT 0.536918 0.548064
bpsolver 2008-06-271088986UNSAT 1.84472 1.85036
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088988UNSAT 5.45117 5.54013
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088987UNSAT 5.72013 5.79651
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088996UNSAT 7.58885 7.68063
Abscon 112v4 AC1088995UNSAT 8.28674 8.40366
galac E1088990? (TO) 1800.01 1810.91
casper zao1088993? (TO) 1800.02 1802.41
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088984? (TO) 1800.03 1815.03
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088978? (TO) 1800.04 1813.42
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088980? (TO) 1800.04 1817.13
galac M1088989? (TO) 1800.05 1810.21
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088979? (TO) 1800.07 1811.72
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088985? (TO) 1800.08 1803.73
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105736? (TO) 1800.08 1807.41
casper zito1088994? (TO) 1800.11 1804.11
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088983? (TO) 1800.18 1813.69

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: