CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-3-28.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-3-28.xml
MD5SUM56a1064229e13fe0f53238d62121e670
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.499923
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables621
Number of constraints13969
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size28
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension13969
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131088845UNSAT 0.499923 0.502706
Mistral-option 1.3141088844UNSAT 0.501923 0.503935
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088834UNSAT 0.533918 0.540507
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088835UNSAT 0.541917 0.549286
cpHydra k_101088850UNSAT 0.554914 0.560541
cpHydra k_401088851UNSAT 0.554914 0.565887
bpsolver 2008-06-271088839UNSAT 1.9587 1.97888
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088841UNSAT 5.72113 5.79746
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088840UNSAT 5.99409 6.10917
Abscon 112v4 AC1088848UNSAT 151.806 152.137
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088849UNSAT 164.989 166.701
galac E1088843? (TO) 1800 1808.51
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088838? (TO) 1800.01 1808.14
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088837? (TO) 1800.04 1807.83
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105739? (TO) 1800.05 1800.81
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088831? (TO) 1800.05 1808.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088832? (TO) 1800.05 1806.02
galac M1088842? (TO) 1800.07 1810.11
casper zito1088847? (TO) 1800.07 1809.51
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088833? (TO) 1800.08 1811.12
casper zao1088846? (TO) 1800.09 1809.21
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088836? (TO) 1800.2 1809.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: