CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/school/
normalized-school1-nsh-13.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/school/
normalized-school1-nsh-13.xml
MD5SUM04705b32837a4b67cef23bd35ddd5cfa
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.694894
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables352
Number of constraints14612
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size13
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension14612
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088709UNSAT 0.694894 0.703213
Mistral-prime 1.3131088719UNSAT 0.736887 0.742295
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088708UNSAT 0.741886 0.753296
Mistral-option 1.3141088718UNSAT 0.742886 0.756931
cpHydra k_401088725UNSAT 0.743886 0.750374
cpHydra k_101088724UNSAT 0.750885 0.762255
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088723UNSAT 3.76543 3.81086
Abscon 112v4 AC1088722UNSAT 4.02539 4.09232
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088714UNSAT 6.72598 8.24049
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088715UNSAT 7.53585 7.63083
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088712UNSAT 453.034 455.102
galac M1088716? (TO) 1800 1803.02
galac E1088717? (TO) 1800.02 1811.11
casper zao1088720? (TO) 1800.03 1806.01
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088711? (TO) 1800.06 1808.43
bpsolver 2008-06-271088713? (TO) 1800.06 1813.91
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088707? (TO) 1800.06 1808.22
casper zito1088721? (TO) 1800.06 1811.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088705? (TO) 1800.07 1809.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088706? (TO) 1800.09 1809.22
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105758? (TO) 1800.1 1801.61
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088710? (TO) 1800.18 1810.61

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: