CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/
myciel/normalized-myciel3-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/
myciel/normalized-myciel3-3.xml
MD5SUM89444e2b32bf8df6968f42d86c8a6777
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.006998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables11
Number of constraints20
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size3
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension20
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
casper zito1088532UNSAT 0.006998 0.0146281
Mistral-prime 1.3131088530UNSAT 0.006998 0.012877
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088520UNSAT 0.006998 0.0126139
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088519UNSAT 0.006998 0.013463
Mistral-option 1.3141088529UNSAT 0.007998 0.0128971
casper zao1088531UNSAT 0.009998 0.016219
cpHydra k_101088535UNSAT 0.018997 0.0252851
cpHydra k_401088536UNSAT 0.019996 0.0235259
bpsolver 2008-06-271088524UNSAT 0.026995 0.0326071
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105713UNSAT 0.288955 0.331041
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088518UNSAT 0.468927 0.563171
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088525UNSAT 0.478926 0.519132
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088523UNSAT 0.495924 0.587485
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088522UNSAT 0.505922 0.688819
galac M1088527UNSAT 0.541916 0.564437
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088526UNSAT 0.549915 0.575612
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088534UNSAT 0.663898 0.729841
Abscon 112v4 AC1088533UNSAT 0.689894 0.732998
galac E1088528UNSAT 0.736887 0.789023
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088521UNSAT 0.853869 0.884014
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088516? (TO) 1800.02 1801.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088517? (TO) 1800.07 1812.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: