CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rlfapScens11/
normalized-scen11-f10.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rlfapScens11/
normalized-scen11-f10.xml
MD5SUMbc79be14db74a5ff6faf231971efa81f
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.721889
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables680
Number of constraints4103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size34
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension4103
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131088131UNSAT 0.721889 0.72816
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088121UNSAT 0.758884 0.770678
cpHydra k_101088136UNSAT 0.795878 0.815368
cpHydra k_401088137UNSAT 0.815875 0.822213
casper zito1088133UNSAT 1.01584 1.03075
casper zao1088132UNSAT 2.18367 2.19325
Abscon 112v4 AC1088134UNSAT 2.69559 2.71644
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088135UNSAT 2.72358 2.87016
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088127UNSAT 6.05808 6.10538
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088119UNSAT 6.28604 6.32653
Mistral-option 1.3141088130UNSAT 6.37303 6.42846
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088126UNSAT 6.604 6.68152
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088124UNSAT 7.2139 7.38181
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088120UNSAT 7.54785 7.61366
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088123UNSAT 9.2016 9.37287
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088122UNSAT 12.7261 12.7088
galac M1088128UNSAT 25.3082 25.5922
galac E1088129UNSAT 27.2019 27.8587
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088118? (TO) 1800.05 1800.82
bpsolver 2008-06-271088125? (TO) 1800.07 1805.81
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088117? (TO) 1800.09 1800.92
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106992? (TO) 1800.1 1811.21

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: