CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp03/
normalized-fapp03-0300-4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp03/
normalized-fapp03-0300-4.xml
MD5SUM20a4b386543d008e4a5d9418ad2d042b
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark11.8522
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables300
Number of constraints4377
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size250
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension4377
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261087728UNSAT 11.8522 11.984
Mistral-prime 1.3131087732UNSAT 12.0562 12.1538
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261087727UNSAT 12.1402 12.4073
Abscon 112v4 AC1087735UNSAT 22.2386 22.5158
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1087736UNSAT 22.2866 22.5254
cpHydra k_401087738UNSAT 30.0074 31.336
cpHydra k_101087737UNSAT 31.1823 31.38
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301087720UNSAT 50.1364 50.627
Sugar v1.13+minisat1087725UNSAT 52.0681 53.7303
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271087722UNSAT 80.3128 80.6493
Sugar v1.13+picosat1087724UNSAT 128.538 135.094
MDG-probe 2008-06-271087721UNSAT 243.623 244.833
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131087723? 335.06 336.592
galac M1087729? (problem) 0.446931 0.519652
galac E1087730? (problem) 0.447931 0.523391
casper zito1087734? (TO) 1800.02 1814.21
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105497? (TO) 1800.06 1801.61
Mistral-option 1.3141087731? (TO) 1800.06 1809.01
casper zao1087733? (TO) 1800.07 1815.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301087719? (TO) 1800.08 1802.62
bpsolver 2008-06-271087726? (TO) 1800.09 1811.71
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301087718? (TO) 1800.09 1802.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: