CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp23/
normalized-fapp23-1800-4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp23/
normalized-fapp23-1800-4.xml
MD5SUM26fa47e715f58ab849bf125de88d1d96
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark17.8113
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables1800
Number of constraints63962
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size302
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension63962
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271087264UNSAT 17.8113 17.9605
Abscon 112v4 AC1087273UNSAT 36.0275 36.42
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1087274UNSAT 36.7784 37.2239
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261087265UNSAT 51.3342 51.419
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261087266UNSAT 56.0325 56.5515
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105557UNSAT 66.2929 67.0246
casper zao1087271UNSAT 70.8212 71.1207
cpHydra k_401087276UNSAT 130.487 131.059
Mistral-option 1.3141087269UNSAT 134.018 135.059
MDG-probe 2008-06-271087259UNSAT 137.658 138.723
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271087260UNSAT 139.764 140.323
Mistral-prime 1.3131087270UNSAT 140.555 141.656
cpHydra k_101087275UNSAT 140.563 141.818
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301087258UNSAT 730.741 734.445
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131087261? 416.965 419.105
Sugar v1.13+picosat1087262? 512.545 521.935
Sugar v1.13+minisat1087263? 529.713 539.142
galac E1087268? (problem) 0.473927 0.575532
galac M1087267? (problem) 0.607907 0.681284
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301087256? (TO) 875 2200.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301087257? (TO) 882.95 2200.02
casper zito1087272? (TO) 1800.08 1808.63

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: