CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp25/
normalized-fapp25-2230-0.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp25/
normalized-fapp25-2230-0.xml
MD5SUM7d256a84222d0f8032eecede595dc56a
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.06223
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables2230
Number of constraints18971
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size302
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension18971
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271086991UNSAT 5.06223 5.1093
casper zito1086999UNSAT 5.2732 5.34638
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105562UNSAT 20.9568 21.1801
Abscon 112v4 AC1087000UNSAT 24.5433 24.7863
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1087001UNSAT 24.5443 24.8992
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261086992UNSAT 34.0548 34.4156
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261086993UNSAT 34.7797 35.1397
casper zao1086998UNSAT 45.2921 45.5226
MDG-probe 2008-06-271086986UNSAT 51.9591 51.9992
cpHydra k_401087003UNSAT 53.9838 54.3181
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271086987UNSAT 54.3137 54.8152
Mistral-prime 1.3131086997UNSAT 54.6377 54.8582
Mistral-option 1.3141086996UNSAT 54.7507 55.1733
cpHydra k_101087002UNSAT 56.5774 57.2033
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301086983UNSAT 107.745 108.303
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301086984UNSAT 114.509 115.717
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301086985UNSAT 167.68 170.017
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131086988? 366.207 367.663
Sugar v1.13+minisat1086990? 463.682 473.855
Sugar v1.13+picosat1086989? 466.788 476.537
galac E1086995? (problem) 0.582911 0.679983
galac M1086994? (problem) 593.591 599.131

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: