CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp33/
normalized-fapp33-0650-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp33/
normalized-fapp33-0650-1.xml
MD5SUM3e4bec5daa9518afb4cc7877fca6f2c5
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark24.5913
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables650
Number of constraints8684
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size498
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension8684
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 AC1086454UNSAT 24.5913 24.7689
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1086455UNSAT 24.8722 25.1736
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261086447UNSAT 34.8447 35.0055
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261086446UNSAT 35.1377 35.5604
Mistral-prime 1.3131086451UNSAT 44.1333 44.3096
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271086441UNSAT 45.868 46.0611
cpHydra k_401086457UNSAT 68.7545 69.8354
cpHydra k_101086456UNSAT 69.7224 70.2223
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301086439UNSAT 136.03 137.159
MDG-probe 2008-06-271086440UNSAT 608.018 612.65
Mistral-option 1.3141086450UNSAT 1084.05 1092.44
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131086442? 460.955 462.899
galac E1086449? (problem) 0.417935 0.50047
galac M1086448? (problem) 0.45093 0.52273
Sugar v1.13+minisat1086444? (MO) 200.734 204.391
Sugar v1.13+picosat1086443? (MO) 383.63 387.744
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301086438? (TO) 1800.03 1800.82
casper zito1086453? (TO) 1800.03 1813.71
bpsolver 2008-06-271086445? (TO) 1800.05 1802.42
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105587? (TO) 1800.06 1811.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301086437? (TO) 1800.07 1802.02
casper zao1086452? (TO) 1800.13 1807.76

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: