CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp11/
normalized-fapp11-1000-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp11/
normalized-fapp11-1000-1.xml
MD5SUMbcc19e6f7720c8259d2ed7a295277868
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark27.3098
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables1000
Number of constraints15032
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size362
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension15032
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 AC1086328UNSAT 27.3098 27.4561
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1086329UNSAT 28.0857 28.3988
cpHydra k_401086331UNSAT 61.7496 62.6659
cpHydra k_101086330UNSAT 62.7235 63.1223
bpsolver 2008-06-271086319UNSAT 73.2449 73.9436
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301086313UNSAT 166.361 166.388
Mistral-prime 1.3131086325UNSAT 400.487 402.527
MDG-probe 2008-06-271086314UNSAT 673.593 676.105
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271086315UNSAT 972.802 980.224
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105520UNSAT 1307.2 1309.77
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131086316? 419.901 420.015
galac E1086323? (problem) 0.464928 0.575605
galac M1086322? (problem) 0.616906 0.955575
Sugar v1.13+minisat1086318? (MO) 241.249 246.24
Sugar v1.13+picosat1086317? (MO) 403.283 407.565
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301086312? (TO) 1800 1814.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301086311? (TO) 1800.07 1812.02
casper zito1086327? (TO) 1800.07 1801.61
casper zao1086326? (TO) 1800.08 1803.86
Mistral-option 1.3141086324? (TO) 1800.1 1810.42
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261086320? (TO) 1800.17 2041.6
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261086321? (TO) 1800.17 1805.51

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: