CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/super-jobShop/
super-jobShop-e0ddr1/normalized-super-jobShop-e0ddr1-2.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/super-jobShop/
super-jobShop-e0ddr1/normalized-super-jobShop-e0ddr1-2.xml
MD5SUM1043ca78e31c5e135d9e78b974637170
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark821.609
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints845
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size119
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension845
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1085331UNSAT 821.609 825.352
Sugar v1.13+picosat1085330UNSAT 1308.6 1318.38
galac M1085335? (TO) 1781.51 2200.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301085324? (TO) 1800 1809.12
galac E1085336? (TO) 1800.02 1810.11
casper zito1085340? (TO) 1800.02 1802.11
Mistral-prime 1.3131085338? (TO) 1800.03 1805.81
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271085328? (TO) 1800.04 1804.91
cpHydra k_101085343? (TO) 1800.04 1818.74
Mistral-option 1.3141085337? (TO) 1800.05 1810.31
MDG-probe 2008-06-271085327? (TO) 1800.06 1810.41
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261085334? (TO) 1800.06 1809.44
cpHydra k_401085344? (TO) 1800.07 1812.63
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301085326? (TO) 1800.08 1806.33
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301085325? (TO) 1800.09 1816.52
casper zao1085339? (TO) 1800.09 1815.61
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261085333? (TO) 1800.1 1813.57
bpsolver 2008-06-271085332? (TO) 1800.1 1810.81
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1085342? (TO) 1800.11 1804.86
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107047? (TO) 1800.11 1811.81
Abscon 112v4 AC1085341? (TO) 1800.15 1810.54
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131085329? (TO) 1800.19 1809.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: