CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/super-queens/
normalized-super-queens-13.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/super-queens/
normalized-super-queens-13.xml
MD5SUM7ca64d29f7b92f5ea95caa9cf94f3ae0
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.008997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables16
Number of constraints92
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension92
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141084156UNSAT 0.008997 0.0166291
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271084147UNSAT 0.010997 0.0168401
MDG-probe 2008-06-271084146UNSAT 0.010997 0.0174449
Mistral-prime 1.3131084157UNSAT 0.011997 0.0178621
cpHydra k_101084162UNSAT 0.020996 0.027879
cpHydra k_401084163UNSAT 0.021995 0.045655
bpsolver 2008-06-271084151UNSAT 0.042993 0.0484779
casper zito1084159UNSAT 0.101983 0.109125
casper zao1084158UNSAT 0.171973 0.179923
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107122UNSAT 0.58491 0.61516
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301084145UNSAT 0.729888 0.791006
Sugar v1.13+minisat1084150UNSAT 0.773882 0.846348
Abscon 112v4 AC1084160UNSAT 0.826873 0.851516
Sugar v1.13+picosat1084149UNSAT 0.831873 0.92336
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1084161UNSAT 0.856869 0.88938
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261084153UNSAT 0.864867 0.893524
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261084152UNSAT 0.870866 0.895457
galac E1084155UNSAT 1.01684 1.07068
galac M1084154UNSAT 1.01784 1.04623
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131084148UNSAT 2.19267 2.22908
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301084144? (TO) 1800.01 1816.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301084143? (TO) 1800.03 1808.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: