CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/super-queens/
normalized-super-queens-11.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/super-queens/
normalized-super-queens-11.xml
MD5SUMd024b00d7492160e14e33ed9f6aa64a5
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.005998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables8
Number of constraints22
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension22
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131084010UNSAT 0.005998 0.0120031
MDG-probe 2008-06-271083999UNSAT 0.005998 0.013739
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271084000UNSAT 0.005998 0.013115
Mistral-option 1.3141084009UNSAT 0.006998 0.0128859
casper zito1084012UNSAT 0.010997 0.0184581
casper zao1084011UNSAT 0.015996 0.022508
cpHydra k_401084016UNSAT 0.016997 0.0220319
cpHydra k_101084015UNSAT 0.017996 0.025919
bpsolver 2008-06-271084004UNSAT 0.025995 0.03384
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107121UNSAT 0.31995 0.384284
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301083998UNSAT 0.465928 0.530249
Sugar v1.13+picosat1084002UNSAT 0.523919 0.608881
Sugar v1.13+minisat1084003UNSAT 0.526919 0.569815
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261084005UNSAT 0.546916 0.585325
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261084006UNSAT 0.549915 0.576989
Abscon 112v4 AC1084013UNSAT 0.665897 0.6828
galac M1084007UNSAT 0.677896 0.732635
galac E1084008UNSAT 0.680895 0.724457
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1084014UNSAT 0.681895 0.783886
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131084001UNSAT 0.867868 0.920867
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301083997? (TO) 1800.02 1800.73
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301083996? (TO) 1800.08 1804.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: