CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford3/
normalized-langford-3-5.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford3/
normalized-langford-3-5.xml
MD5SUM43c8eda3f5b2d1223300980939f8a7f5
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.008997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables15
Number of constraints115
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension115
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141082143UNSAT 0.008997 0.0164111
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271082134UNSAT 0.008997 0.016219
Mistral-prime 1.3131082144UNSAT 0.009997 0.0166381
casper zito1082146UNSAT 0.010997 0.0186129
MDG-probe 2008-06-271082133UNSAT 0.011997 0.0168791
cpHydra k_101082149UNSAT 0.020996 0.027483
cpHydra k_401082150UNSAT 0.022996 0.0280721
casper zao1082145UNSAT 0.024996 0.0330371
bpsolver 2008-06-271082138UNSAT 0.037994 0.0447171
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105915UNSAT 0.412936 0.428792
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261082140UNSAT 0.668897 0.677056
Sugar v1.13+picosat1082136UNSAT 0.686895 0.772889
Sugar v1.13+minisat1082137UNSAT 0.692894 0.810312
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261082139UNSAT 0.71989 0.737059
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301082132UNSAT 0.745886 0.798279
Abscon 112v4 AC1082147UNSAT 0.767883 0.784824
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1082148UNSAT 0.862868 0.890833
galac M1082141UNSAT 0.974851 0.994753
galac E1082142UNSAT 1.14182 1.20372
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131082135UNSAT 1.71774 1.83744
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301082131? (TO) 1800.08 1811.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301082130? (TO) 1800.1 1809.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: