CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/js-taillard-20-15/
normalized-js-taillard-20-15-100-0.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/js-taillard-20-15/
normalized-js-taillard-20-15-100-0.xml
MD5SUM3316fb6d9502bdc5e45b3fbdaa4097b4
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables300
Number of constraints3130
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size1375
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3130
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac E1080962? (problem) 61.4907 61.5563
galac M1080961? (problem) 62.1446 62.4607
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080955? (exit code) 275.512 276.815
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080956? (TO) 1800.01 1808.23
cpHydra k_101080969? (TO) 1800.01 1822.43
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080957? (TO) 1800.01 1815.66
Mistral-prime 1.3131080964? (TO) 1800.03 1834.31
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105859? (TO) 1800.04 1801.31
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080950? (TO) 1800.04 1808.82
bpsolver 2008-06-271080958? (TO) 1800.04 1807.02
casper zao1080965? (TO) 1800.05 1811.62
cpHydra k_401080970? (TO) 1800.06 1816.14
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080960? (TO) 1800.06 1817.16
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080954? (TO) 1800.08 1808.61
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080952? (TO) 1800.08 1800.82
casper zito1080966? (TO) 1800.09 1806.11
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080951? (TO) 1800.09 1836.32
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080968? (TO) 1800.1 1809.68
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080959? (TO) 1800.1 1808.24
Mistral-option 1.3141080963? (TO) 1800.1 1818.51
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080953? (TO) 1800.1 1820.81
Abscon 112v4 AC1080967? (TO) 1800.12 1816.36

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: