CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-2.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-2.xml
MD5SUM877930d791f791ac52b467f86549d1e4
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.034994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables144
Number of constraints64
Maximum constraint arity16
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension64
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080533UNSAT 0.034994 0.04218
Mistral-prime 1.3131080544UNSAT 0.035994 0.042166
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080534UNSAT 0.036993 0.0418939
Mistral-option 1.3141080543UNSAT 0.036994 0.0416491
cpHydra k_401080550UNSAT 0.046992 0.053468
cpHydra k_101080549UNSAT 0.046992 0.0584529
casper zito1080546UNSAT 0.076987 0.0840821
bpsolver 2008-06-271080538UNSAT 0.085986 0.0913369
casper zao1080545UNSAT 0.686895 0.695058
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080540UNSAT 0.895863 0.952504
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080539UNSAT 0.920859 0.93819
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080537UNSAT 1.42478 1.53492
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080548UNSAT 1.46578 1.51841
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080536UNSAT 1.47477 1.57718
Abscon 112v4 AC1080547UNSAT 1.58576 1.62602
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080531UNSAT 89.5014 89.5816
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080530UNSAT 97.3552 97.8677
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080532UNSAT 133.455 133.527
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106601? 0.325949 0.380807
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080535? 273.915 273.327
galac E1080542? (problem) 101.339 101.432
galac M1080541? (problem) 105.23 106.248

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: