CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-13_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-13_ext.xml
MD5SUM08bc20cb4b4f6b35bbc57e84fe4cb0e6
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.90371
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints58
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension58
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091080202SAT 1.90371 1.92434
Mistral-prime 1.3131080215SAT 16.8814 16.8967
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080205SAT 18.5772 18.7417
Mistral-option 1.3141080214SAT 18.7781 18.9263
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080204SAT 19.1171 19.2225
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080199SAT 21.8517 21.9726
cpHydra k_101080220SAT 26.416 26.7474
cpHydra k_401080221SAT 26.485 26.8727
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080201SAT 43.0285 43.4428
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080206SAT 51.6431 51.752
spider 2008-06-141080203SAT 113.427 114.445
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106824SAT 157.261 157.319
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080219SAT 173.314 173.427
Abscon 112v4 AC1080218SAT 185.541 187.356
casper zao1080216SAT 222.028 223.14
bpsolver 2008-06-271080209SAT 285.955 286.103
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080211SAT 327.027 329.777
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080208SAT 422.251 424.415
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080207SAT 572.688 575.663
galac M1080212? (TO) 1800.01 1827.21
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080200? (TO) 1800.06 1813.62
casper zito1080217? (TO) 1800.07 1816.41
galac E1080213? (TO) 1800.09 1810.41
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080210? (TO) 1800.14 1805.36

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
14 19 7 2 10 1 14 16 9 3 10 18 7 12 16 16 3 0 4 5