CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg4-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg4-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMb9f5c2e90c6b6d28f0c1356d0bea894b
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.047992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints10
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension10
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091079374SAT 0.047992 0.0537361
MDG-probe 2008-06-271079376SAT 0.076987 0.0794689
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271079377SAT 0.214966 0.222323
cpHydra k_101079392SAT 0.282956 0.572134
Mistral-prime 1.3131079387SAT 0.287955 0.293343
cpHydra k_401079393SAT 0.301953 0.308937
Mistral-option 1.3141079386SAT 0.394939 0.429038
spider 2008-06-141079375SAT 0.510922 0.517704
casper zito1079389SAT 0.532918 0.895687
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105988SAT 0.748886 0.798323
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1079391SAT 0.861868 0.939122
Abscon 112v4 AC1079390SAT 0.898862 1.59909
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261079382SAT 1.26581 1.30347
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261079383SAT 1.38179 1.41559
bpsolver 2008-06-271079381SAT 2.81357 2.84227
casper zao1079388SAT 4.06338 4.07804
Sugar v1.13+minisat1079380SAT 10.8414 10.9823
galac E1079385SAT 11.6392 11.7869
Sugar v1.13+picosat1079379SAT 18.8131 19.0708
galac M1079384SAT 117.246 117.92
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301079373SAT 143.507 144.733
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131079378? 89.7304 83.5538
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301079371? (TO) 1800.07 2024.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301079372? (TO) 1800.08 1801.83

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
18 15 14 13 6 4 0 4 13 4 8 3 13 0 19 8 21 4 18 19 14 11 4 13