CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-50_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-50_ext.xml
MD5SUMcec7bbc1f4223b37f158f0cf026d1076
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark28.3577
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints59
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension59
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271078441SAT 28.3577 28.5843
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301078437SAT 28.3917 28.429
Mistral-option 1.3141078450SAT 32.607 32.7013
Mistral-prime 1.3131078451SAT 36.1635 36.4481
Abscon 112v4 AC1078454SAT 38.8051 39.2152
cpHydra k_101078456SAT 44.1513 44.69
cpHydra k_401078457SAT 44.7332 45.3097
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1078455SAT 62.1146 62.7917
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131078442SAT 81.0207 81.9076
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106821SAT 109.036 109.294
MDG-probe 2008-06-271078440SAT 111.813 112.685
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261078446SAT 144.487 145.897
mddc-solv 2008-06-091078438SAT 144.983 145.823
Sugar v1.13+minisat1078444SAT 206.129 208.197
spider 2008-06-141078439SAT 363.339 363.863
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301078435SAT 728.379 730.333
bpsolver 2008-06-271078445SAT 1329.39 1337.32
casper zao1078452? (TO) 1800.02 1808.31
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301078436? (TO) 1800.03 1804.72
casper zito1078453? (TO) 1800.04 1807.41
galac M1078448? (TO) 1800.06 1817.22
Sugar v1.13+picosat1078443? (TO) 1800.06 1801.92
galac E1078449? (TO) 1800.07 1810.01
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261078447? (TO) 1800.09 1801.17

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 8 13 12 11 1 16 18 16 8 0 12 0 15 8 12 12 5 15 12