CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-14_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-14_ext.xml
MD5SUM1b567671b13df00338ea68e530a77205
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.3268
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints59
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension59
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271078395SAT 1.3268 1.3433
Mistral-prime 1.3131078405SAT 1.9517 1.9732
mddc-solv 2008-06-091078392SAT 1.9677 1.98998
spider 2008-06-141078393SAT 7.51786 7.58639
MDG-probe 2008-06-271078394SAT 7.74482 7.77276
Mistral-option 1.3141078404SAT 7.92379 7.99825
cpHydra k_101078410SAT 9.41357 9.59079
cpHydra k_401078411SAT 9.58054 9.76608
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301078391SAT 15.6756 15.8685
Sugar v1.13+picosat1078397SAT 18.5042 18.8394
Sugar v1.13+minisat1078398SAT 21.1718 21.6298
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106799SAT 30.0574 30.3899
Abscon 112v4 AC1078408SAT 37.8992 38.2028
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1078409SAT 39.8589 40.2892
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301078389SAT 50.3453 50.8693
bpsolver 2008-06-271078399SAT 92.398 92.7404
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261078401SAT 100.514 101.542
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261078400SAT 125.558 126.191
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131078396SAT 142.129 142.87
casper zito1078407SAT 262.4 264.537
casper zao1078406SAT 327.919 329.622
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301078390SAT 584.933 585.215
galac E1078403SAT 695.326 696.79
galac M1078402? (TO) 1800.02 1813.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
11 19 16 1 5 11 4 19 14 3 2 19 8 15 0 1 5 19 14 8