CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-41_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-41_ext.xml
MD5SUM3041a3ef4ef8ba4a0b9d098f8d6784fb
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark23.5124
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints60
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension60
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141078335SAT 23.5124 23.702
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301078322SAT 24.4813 24.7639
mddc-solv 2008-06-091078323SAT 25.4621 25.6811
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271078326SAT 27.3458 27.5655
Mistral-prime 1.3131078336SAT 28.7086 28.9877
cpHydra k_401078342SAT 36.9014 37.4204
cpHydra k_101078341SAT 37.0774 37.555
MDG-probe 2008-06-271078325SAT 47.1478 47.5156
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261078332SAT 154.814 155.084
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261078331SAT 162.92 163.093
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1078340SAT 185.835 187.669
Abscon 112v4 AC1078339SAT 190.327 192.215
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106817SAT 247.997 250.451
bpsolver 2008-06-271078330SAT 271.511 273.615
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301078320SAT 279.985 282.485
Sugar v1.13+picosat1078328SAT 481.837 486.003
spider 2008-06-141078324SAT 549.133 550.327
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131078327SAT 975.366 978.248
Sugar v1.13+minisat1078329? (TO) 1800.02 1814.52
galac M1078333? (TO) 1800.02 1808.01
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301078321? (TO) 1800.08 1809.42
galac E1078334? (TO) 1800.09 1806.51
casper zao1078337? (TO) 1800.09 1807.31
casper zito1078338? (TO) 1800.09 1802.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
7 7 16 9 15 19 2 18 10 1 5 9 11 1 16 10 1 4 9 8