CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-31_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-31_ext.xml
MD5SUM6932a0ef419b59e7a7cf8206b8767fc1
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark15.0227
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints59
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension59
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131078281SAT 15.0227 15.2115
Mistral-option 1.3141078289SAT 20.0789 20.0988
Sugar v1.13+minisat1078283SAT 21.2388 21.5058
MDG-probe 2008-06-271078279SAT 42.4885 42.6984
Mistral-prime 1.3131078290SAT 42.8155 42.9953
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271078280SAT 46.7829 47.1459
cpHydra k_101078295SAT 50.2354 50.8189
mddc-solv 2008-06-091078277SAT 60.0699 60.5462
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301078276SAT 82.9764 83.0778
Abscon 112v4 AC1078293SAT 150.759 150.736
cpHydra k_401078296SAT 160.578 169.302
Sugar v1.13+picosat1078282SAT 178.421 180.226
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1078294SAT 195.938 197.799
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301078274SAT 256.407 258.464
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106809SAT 339.912 342.455
spider 2008-06-141078278SAT 353.968 356.703
bpsolver 2008-06-271078284SAT 409.848 412.97
casper zao1078291SAT 434.638 438.604
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261078286SAT 876.302 884.622
galac E1078288? (TO) 1800 1817.12
galac M1078287? (TO) 1800.01 1801.31
casper zito1078292? (TO) 1800.07 1801.01
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301078275? (TO) 1800.08 1803.22
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261078285? (TO) 1800.11 1809.34

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
12 16 4 10 3 9 9 19 16 0 11 19 19 5 14 10 2 4 4 12