CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ogdVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-ogd-vg6-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ogdVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-ogd-vg6-7_ext.xml
MD5SUMba0febeeb73bfd060fc0110af6cb46ed
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.430933
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables42
Number of constraints13
Maximum constraint arity7
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension13
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091076781SAT 0.430933 0.44238
Abscon 112v4 AC1076797SAT 1.52077 1.57505
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1076798SAT 1.64575 1.68026
cpHydra k_101076799SAT 8.94664 9.06537
cpHydra k_401076800SAT 8.94964 9.25678
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261076789SAT 12.6641 12.8319
Mistral-prime 1.3131076794SAT 13.394 13.5004
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271076784SAT 16.6015 16.6788
Mistral-option 1.3141076793SAT 19.2551 19.4216
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106124SAT 25.2032 25.1855
MDG-probe 2008-06-271076783SAT 28.8436 29.0991
casper zito1076796SAT 156.207 157.696
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301076780SAT 198.167 200.1
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261076790SAT 236.656 238.951
casper zao1076795SAT 287.031 289.768
bpsolver 2008-06-271076788SAT 305.388 306.881
Sugar v1.13+minisat1076787SAT 441.144 441.638
Sugar v1.13+picosat1076786SAT 709.33 710.308
spider 2008-06-141076782SAT 1560.45 1561.59
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131076785? 91.2931 88.1203
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301076779? (TO) 1800 1800.92
galac E1076792? (TO) 1800.01 1808.32
galac M1076791? (TO) 1800.05 1815.51
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301076778? (TO) 1800.08 1800.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
2 0 2 4 17 4 18 0 2 0 19 4 13 4 17 4 19 8 6 4 17 15 4 8 6 13 8 19 4 13 13 4 0 3 4 4 18 18 0 8 4 18