CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-4/
normalized-os-taillard-4-95-4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-4/
normalized-os-taillard-4-95-4.xml
MD5SUM0dc881dcf5f24d5a75bda8e44ec68a89
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.009997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables16
Number of constraints48
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size255
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension48
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131074877UNSAT 0.009997 0.013173
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271074867UNSAT 0.010998 0.016161
Mistral-option 1.3141074876UNSAT 0.011997 0.017111
cpHydra k_101074882UNSAT 0.020996 0.027461
cpHydra k_401074883UNSAT 0.022996 0.0276419
bpsolver 2008-06-271074871UNSAT 0.035994 0.0414241
MDG-probe 2008-06-271074866UNSAT 0.141977 0.149177
casper zito1074879UNSAT 0.224965 0.226205
casper zao1074878UNSAT 0.352946 0.360376
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106175UNSAT 0.532918 0.588408
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261074872UNSAT 0.575912 0.633163
Sugar v1.13+minisat1074870UNSAT 0.625904 0.711398
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261074873UNSAT 0.663898 0.684027
Sugar v1.13+picosat1074869UNSAT 0.84987 0.926876
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301074865UNSAT 2.81557 2.84508
Abscon 112v4 AC1074880UNSAT 5.13822 5.21389
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1074881UNSAT 5.62814 5.68537
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131074868UNSAT 38.2102 38.6005
galac M1074874UNSAT 53.9688 54.5059
galac E1074875UNSAT 816.617 824.409
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301074863? (TO) 1800.07 1810.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301074864? (TO) 1800.09 1809.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: