CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-28_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-28_ext.xml
MD5SUMaaab39258fe57b7e4bd8b15411b7940a
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.38618
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints72
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size24
Number of constraints which are defined in extension72
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131072460SAT 5.38618 5.43554
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271072450SAT 5.69613 5.69783
Mistral-option 1.3141072459SAT 13.7079 13.8206
MDG-probe 2008-06-271072449SAT 27.9168 28.1381
Abscon 112v4 AC1072463SAT 30.5774 30.8955
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301072446SAT 31.3202 31.3765
mddc-solv 2008-06-091072447SAT 37.2813 37.2966
cpHydra k_401072466SAT 37.5973 37.8786
cpHydra k_101072465SAT 39.9959 40.7867
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1072464SAT 41.7037 42.1316
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106855SAT 57.0893 57.6179
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261072456SAT 86.1459 87.0024
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131072451SAT 221.7 219.255
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261072455SAT 592.377 598.11
casper zito1072462SAT 878.487 882.253
Sugar v1.13+minisat1072453SAT 1274.65 1279.86
spider 2008-06-141072448SAT 1527.46 1532.91
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301072444? (TO) 1800.02 1809.22
casper zao1072461? (TO) 1800.05 1800.92
galac E1072458? (TO) 1800.05 1801.61
galac M1072457? (TO) 1800.06 1801.21
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301072445? (TO) 1800.07 1805.52
bpsolver 2008-06-271072454? (TO) 1800.11 1800.82
Sugar v1.13+picosat1072452? (TO) 1800.12 1829.93

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
9 4 18 0 6 0 16 4 15 2 15 23 2 13 13 20 11 2 12 13 12 15 18 2