CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-32_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-24-24-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-24-24-76-632-fcd-32_ext.xml
MD5SUM4090475ced81db94eda2eadfae3d450f
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark28.4337
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints72
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size24
Number of constraints which are defined in extension72
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271072012SAT 23.1665 23.3741
Mistral-prime 1.3131072023SAT 28.4337 28.5704
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271072013SAT 30.7963 31.042
cpHydra k_101072028SAT 36.0295 36.3275
cpHydra k_401072029SAT 72.442 73.0953
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301072009SAT 188.59 189.533
casper zao1072024SAT 239.951 241.128
mddc-solv 2008-06-091072010SAT 400.078 403.853
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261072019SAT 441.255 441.477
spider 2008-06-141072011SAT 450.024 450.233
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106858SAT 613.591 619.498
Abscon 112v4 AC1072026SAT 753.537 754.714
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1072027SAT 877.236 882.351
Mistral-option 1.3141072022SAT 937.348 945.44
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301072008? (TO) 1800 1807.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301072007? (TO) 1800 1815.12
galac M1072020? (TO) 1800 1808.11
galac E1072021? (TO) 1800.01 1803.71
casper zito1072025? (TO) 1800.03 1805.02
Sugar v1.13+minisat1072016? (TO) 1800.1 1810.23
bpsolver 2008-06-271072017? (TO) 1800.12 1811.52
Sugar v1.13+picosat1072015? (TO) 1800.15 1811.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131072014? (TO) 1800.15 1807.92
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261072018? (TO) 1800.18 1810.18

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 19 17 1 7 2 16 7 0 22 1 7 22 10 4 20 22 20 11 20 3 14 19 0