CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/aim-200/
normalized-aim-200-6-0-sat-3_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/aim-200/
normalized-aim-200-6-0-sat-3_ext.xml
MD5SUMdd59cb5a67c1fbc24f6065e8ee0421f3
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.033994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables200
Number of constraints1152
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension1152
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131053652SAT 0.033994 0.040913
Mistral-option 1.3141053651SAT 0.039993 0.0450909
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271053642SAT 0.044992 0.0460709
MDG-probe 2008-06-271053641SAT 0.046992 0.058835
cpHydra k_101053657SAT 0.048992 0.0564399
cpHydra k_401053658SAT 0.049992 0.0568199
casper zao1053653SAT 0.079987 0.0865989
mddc-solv 2008-06-091053639SAT 0.12498 0.131728
spider 2008-06-141053640SAT 0.128979 0.135383
casper zito1053654SAT 0.547916 0.554831
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105043SAT 0.669898 0.696988
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301053638SAT 0.784879 0.833763
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261053648SAT 0.805877 0.83813
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301053637SAT 0.826873 0.848545
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261053647SAT 0.852869 0.893619
Sugar v1.13+minisat1053645SAT 1.06984 1.14863
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1053656SAT 1.18882 1.21348
Abscon 112v4 AC1053655SAT 1.23081 1.19986
Sugar v1.13+picosat1053644SAT 1.23381 1.32617
galac M1053649SAT 1.58076 1.63631
galac E1053650SAT 1.75473 1.85762
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131053643SAT 1.91371 1.96525
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301053636SAT 9.2296 9.3122
bpsolver 2008-06-271053646SAT 59.204 59.237

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0