CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-5/
normalized-os-taillard-5-95-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-5/
normalized-os-taillard-5-95-8.xml
MD5SUMec69a18ba15b065d64b927e35a64648c
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.014997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables25
Number of constraints100
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size320
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension100
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131071198UNSAT 0.014997 0.015313
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271071188UNSAT 0.015997 0.0221669
Mistral-option 1.3141071197UNSAT 0.023995 0.031949
cpHydra k_401071204UNSAT 0.026995 0.0266871
cpHydra k_101071203UNSAT 0.030994 0.107205
bpsolver 2008-06-271071192UNSAT 0.046992 0.0503019
MDG-probe 2008-06-271071187UNSAT 0.235963 0.242301
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261071194UNSAT 0.6499 0.684033
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261071193UNSAT 0.660898 0.690286
Sugar v1.13+minisat1071191UNSAT 0.768882 0.864754
Sugar v1.13+picosat1071190UNSAT 1.14382 1.29903
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106186UNSAT 2.97855 3.02405
casper zao1071199UNSAT 3.19651 3.25345
Abscon 112v4 AC1071201UNSAT 11.1593 10.9968
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1071202UNSAT 11.5083 11.7852
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301071186UNSAT 18.3262 18.7152
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131071189UNSAT 61.9206 62.002
galac M1071195UNSAT 573.976 576.05
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301071184? (TO) 1800.02 1817.13
galac E1071196? (TO) 1800.02 1804.91
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301071185? (TO) 1800.04 1814.62
casper zito1071200? (TO) 1800.06 1801.61

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: