CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-5/
normalized-os-taillard-5-95-9.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-5/
normalized-os-taillard-5-95-9.xml
MD5SUM3774165680e9fa70f03570a39d0486b3
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.014997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables25
Number of constraints100
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size297
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension100
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271071125UNSAT 0.014997 0.0218399
Mistral-prime 1.3131071135UNSAT 0.014997 0.0221059
cpHydra k_401071141UNSAT 0.024995 0.0334709
Mistral-option 1.3141071134UNSAT 0.028995 0.0335451
cpHydra k_101071140UNSAT 0.029995 0.0344291
bpsolver 2008-06-271071129UNSAT 0.045992 0.0476031
MDG-probe 2008-06-271071124UNSAT 0.227964 0.241634
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261071131UNSAT 0.6509 0.572766
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261071130UNSAT 0.6519 0.681653
Sugar v1.13+minisat1071128UNSAT 0.743886 0.860213
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106187UNSAT 0.896862 0.937004
Sugar v1.13+picosat1071127UNSAT 1.07983 1.20354
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301071123UNSAT 5.78512 5.81219
Abscon 112v4 AC1071138UNSAT 6.66299 6.71763
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1071139UNSAT 12.4151 12.7152
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131071126UNSAT 48.2707 48.5101
casper zito1071137UNSAT 58.3741 58.8874
casper zao1071136UNSAT 88.9395 89.382
galac M1071132UNSAT 297.555 299.583
galac E1071133? (TO) 1800.01 1811.91
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301071122? (TO) 1800.05 1802.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301071121? (TO) 1800.08 1801.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: