CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/bddSmall/
normalized-bdd-21-133-18-78-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/bddSmall/
normalized-bdd-21-133-18-78-8_ext.xml
MD5SUMa4f9e7aefae7ad10223acb0ad88dbbd6
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.71589
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables21
Number of constraints133
Maximum constraint arity18
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension133
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271052167SAT 0.71589 0.720176
MDG-probe 2008-06-271052166SAT 0.719889 0.732304
cpHydra k_101052182SAT 0.728889 0.732652
Mistral-prime 1.3131052177SAT 0.765882 0.773099
cpHydra k_401052183SAT 0.770882 0.783991
Mistral-option 1.3141052176SAT 0.771882 0.784219
spider 2008-06-141052165SAT 1.03084 1.04955
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1052181SAT 4.35434 4.44504
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261052172SAT 6.60999 6.62558
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261052173SAT 7.09792 7.15293
mddc-solv 2008-06-091052164SAT 9.75851 9.85823
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301052163SAT 13.442 13.5626
Abscon 112v4 AC1052180SAT 19.655 19.869
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301052161SAT 50.7733 51.2358
bpsolver 2008-06-271052171SAT 135.041 135.107
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301052162SAT 323.324 326.418
casper zao1052178SAT 502.312 506.153
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131052168? 81.8216 79.9313
Sugar v1.13+minisat1052170? 93.1528 94.1205
Sugar v1.13+picosat1052169? 102.929 104.026
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104961? (MO) 7.12 7.21982
galac M1052174? (MO) 546.07 546.815
galac E1052175? (MO) 587.22 590.514
casper zito1052179? (TO) 1800.1 1802.21

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0