CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg4-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg4-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMa797a3acf3e0d060958fe9edcfa2a904
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.105983
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints10
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension10
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271068981SAT 0.064989 0.0652789
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271068982SAT 0.105983 0.105362
mddc-solv 2008-06-091068979SAT 0.111982 0.115339
Mistral-option 1.3141068991SAT 0.114982 0.120892
Mistral-prime 1.3131068992SAT 0.117981 0.123799
cpHydra k_401068998SAT 0.118981 0.118395
cpHydra k_101068997SAT 0.12798 0.134324
spider 2008-06-141068980SAT 0.437932 0.443213
Abscon 112v4 AC1068995SAT 0.852869 0.892676
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1068996SAT 0.885865 0.9394
casper zito1068994SAT 1.42578 1.44349
casper zao1068993SAT 1.47078 1.48742
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261068987SAT 1.9467 1.98479
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261068988SAT 2.02869 2.09417
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107334SAT 2.14067 2.17864
bpsolver 2008-06-271068986SAT 3.63445 3.66819
galac M1068989SAT 24.3133 24.6423
galac E1068990SAT 28.2037 28.4961
Sugar v1.13+minisat1068985SAT 75.0946 76.026
Sugar v1.13+picosat1068984SAT 80.7137 81.805
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301068978SAT 102.866 102.952
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131068983? 82.9494 79.1143
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301068976? (TO) 1800.03 1800.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301068977? (TO) 1800.04 1807.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 8 1 0 11 3 0 17 0 1 8 0 13 14 19 1 0 3 0 13 19 0 17 0