CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg6-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg6-8_ext.xml
MD5SUMf09c9c69a0c23ac505219acc227a0e89
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1256.66
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables48
Number of constraints14
Maximum constraint arity8
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension14
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 AC1068880SAT 1256.66 1261.02
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131068868? 74.4847 73.6784
Sugar v1.13+minisat1068870? (TO) 1800 1808.29
Mistral-option 1.3141068876? (TO) 1800.01 1807.71
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107343? (TO) 1800.02 1809.42
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301068862? (TO) 1800.02 1815.12
galac E1068875? (TO) 1800.02 1807.71
Mistral-prime 1.3131068877? (TO) 1800.03 1818.41
MDG-probe 2008-06-271068866? (TO) 1800.03 1804.41
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301068863? (TO) 1800.04 1801.72
galac M1068874? (TO) 1800.04 1806.52
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271068867? (TO) 1800.05 1814.91
casper zito1068879? (TO) 1800.05 1807.21
spider 2008-06-141068865? (TO) 1800.05 1816.21
bpsolver 2008-06-271068871? (TO) 1800.06 1804.83
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261068873? (TO) 1800.06 1809.74
casper zao1068878? (TO) 1800.07 1815.21
cpHydra k_101068882? (TO) 1800.07 1801.34
cpHydra k_401068883? (TO) 1800.08 1833.94
mddc-solv 2008-06-091068864? (TO) 1800.08 1815.81
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301068861? (TO) 1800.08 1808.82
Sugar v1.13+picosat1068869? (TO) 1800.1 1815.43
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1068881? (TO) 1800.1 1802.04
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261068872? (TO) 1800.13 1807.86

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
2 11 0 18 15 8 13 6 0 8 17 11 8 13 4 17 17 4 12 8 19 19 4 4 15 17 0 2 19 8 18 4 4 13 3 4 0 17 4 3 17 4 0 18 18 4 18 18