CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg6-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg6-6_ext.xml
MD5SUM7f6583e4b68c1a523eb73180242a388f
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.458929
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables36
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091068749SAT 0.458929 0.463352
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1068766SAT 1.09383 1.14743
Abscon 112v4 AC1068765SAT 1.14782 1.18394
Mistral-option 1.3141068761SAT 2.04669 2.05892
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261068757SAT 3.00454 3.08187
casper zao1068763SAT 4.52631 4.54916
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107342SAT 4.69929 4.77402
Mistral-prime 1.3131068762SAT 6.40902 6.41263
bpsolver 2008-06-271068756SAT 7.00693 7.00948
cpHydra k_101068767SAT 8.13676 8.24606
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271068752SAT 8.23175 8.301
cpHydra k_401068768SAT 8.39872 8.57324
casper zito1068764SAT 8.97363 8.97705
MDG-probe 2008-06-271068751SAT 11.5732 11.6652
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261068758SAT 21.6497 21.7097
spider 2008-06-141068750SAT 82.9584 83.3027
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301068748SAT 183.148 184.907
galac M1068759SAT 365.629 369.55
Sugar v1.13+minisat1068755SAT 392.25 396.063
Sugar v1.13+picosat1068754SAT 547.982 553.356
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131068753? 78.0211 77.1628
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301068746? (TO) 1800.01 1816.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301068747? (TO) 1800.06 1813.12
galac E1068760? (TO) 1800.09 1809.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
6 0 18 8 5 24 0 17 0 1 11 4 18 0 17 4 4 18 8 1 4 23 4 18 5 11 4 4 2 4 24 4 18 18 4 18