CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/golombRulerArity4/
normalized-ruler-44-10-a4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/golombRulerArity4/
normalized-ruler-44-10-a4.xml
MD5SUMd64b0b30fe6539783bc7e2d71db09770
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.72067
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables10
Number of constraints915
Maximum constraint arity4
Maximum domain size45
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension915
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104792UNSAT 4.98624 5.10372
bpsolver 2008-06-271051199UNSAT 8.72067 8.76376
casper zito1051207UNSAT 122.873 122.937
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301051193UNSAT 161.465 163.033
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1051209UNSAT 165.991 167.451
casper zao1051206UNSAT 240.374 242.436
Abscon 112v4 AC1051208UNSAT 242.735 243.749
cpHydra k_401051211UNSAT 250.999 254.429
cpHydra k_101051210UNSAT 257.504 266.483
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271051195UNSAT 302.217 304.809
Mistral-prime 1.3131051205UNSAT 440.378 444.171
MDG-probe 2008-06-271051194UNSAT 543.122 545.014
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261051201UNSAT 629.815 633.395
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261051200UNSAT 637.048 641.129
galac E1051203? (TO) 1800.01 1813.71
Sugar v1.13+minisat1051198? (TO) 1800.02 1809.01
galac M1051202? (TO) 1800.04 1805.81
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301051192? (TO) 1800.07 1812.92
Sugar v1.13+picosat1051197? (TO) 1800.08 1817.45
Mistral-option 1.3141051204? (TO) 1800.09 1805.21
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301051191? (TO) 1800.1 1801.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131051196? (TO) 1801.9 1808.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: