CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/wordsVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-words-vg4-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/wordsVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-words-vg4-8_ext.xml
MD5SUMa7715be9ecd59779c269bf6066fd7c0a
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.973851
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables32
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity8
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091066935SAT 0.973851 0.98319
Mistral-option 1.3141066947SAT 1.03284 1.0447
Mistral-prime 1.3131066948SAT 1.09883 1.10664
cpHydra k_401066954SAT 1.11383 1.12008
cpHydra k_101066953SAT 1.11583 1.12557
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1066952SAT 1.71174 1.77727
MDG-probe 2008-06-271066937SAT 1.78073 1.79887
Abscon 112v4 AC1066951SAT 1.83972 1.88332
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261066943SAT 3.21851 3.29156
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301066934SAT 3.65244 3.70787
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271066938SAT 4.41533 4.4601
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107421SAT 7.32389 7.43189
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261066944SAT 7.95079 8.03104
casper zito1066950SAT 9.8505 9.89542
casper zao1066949SAT 11.1283 11.2215
Sugar v1.13+minisat1066941SAT 279.292 280.397
bpsolver 2008-06-271066942SAT 484.152 488.546
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131066939? 87.0348 85.4714
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301066933? (TO) 1800.01 1811.52
galac E1066946? (TO) 1800.04 1816.01
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301066932? (TO) 1800.05 1811.02
galac M1066945? (TO) 1800.07 1817.51
spider 2008-06-141066936? (TO) 1800.08 1801.91
Sugar v1.13+picosat1066940? (TO) 1800.13 1817.23

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
15 0 17 18 8 5 0 11 0 3 0 15 19 8 21 4 3 0 12 14 2 11 4 18 18 12 14 19 7 4 17 18