CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-blast-floppy1-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-blast-floppy1-7.xml
MD5SUMa04faf5e65e20ff86e086efdc76bdac3
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.665898
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables2913
Number of constraints3104
Maximum constraint arity25
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3104
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271064880UNSAT 0.665898 0.671355
cpHydra k_401064896UNSAT 0.72189 0.727924
cpHydra k_101064895UNSAT 0.722889 0.760847
Mistral-option 1.3141064889UNSAT 0.724889 0.736893
Mistral-prime 1.3131064890UNSAT 0.84887 0.855574
casper zao1064891UNSAT 1.07883 1.09591
casper zito1064892UNSAT 1.37079 1.37855
bpsolver 2008-06-271064884UNSAT 2.76258 2.79261
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261064885UNSAT 4.5823 4.65609
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261064886UNSAT 4.71828 4.81446
MDG-probe 2008-06-271064879UNSAT 39.211 39.3979
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106562UNSAT 84.1652 84.8069
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301064878UNSAT 351.755 353.522
Abscon 112v4 AC1064893UNSAT 663.041 665.576
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1064894UNSAT 911.183 915.269
Sugar v1.13+minisat1064883? 167.298 173.223
Sugar v1.13+picosat1064882? 170.784 178.173
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131064881? 426.602 428.462
galac M1064887? (problem) 49.2405 49.9758
galac E1064888? (problem) 49.4515 49.9832
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301064877? (TO) 1800.04 1811.63
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301064876? (TO) 1800.08 1807.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: