CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-43s-smv.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-43s-smv.xml
MD5SUM12d27c64e696cc8c609d7f2cba3eeb46
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark93.9577
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables3655
Number of constraints8685
Maximum constraint arity15
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension8685
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1063812UNSAT 93.9577 99.6518
Sugar v1.13+picosat1063811UNSAT 195.867 196.975
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131063810? 401.908 403.335
cpHydra k_101063824? (TO) 1800.03 1816.63
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301063806? (TO) 1800.03 1809.12
casper zito1063821? (TO) 1800.03 1801.51
Mistral-prime 1.3131063819? (TO) 1800.03 1808.21
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301063805? (TO) 1800.04 1824.52
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106558? (TO) 1800.04 1808.21
casper zao1063820? (TO) 1800.04 1808.21
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301063807? (TO) 1800.04 1807.52
MDG-probe 2008-06-271063808? (TO) 1800.05 1807.01
cpHydra k_401063825? (TO) 1800.06 1805.14
bpsolver 2008-06-271063813? (TO) 1800.07 1805.21
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261063814? (TO) 1800.08 1817.04
Mistral-option 1.3141063818? (TO) 1800.09 1806.22
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271063809? (TO) 1800.1 1814.02
Abscon 112v4 AC1063822? (TO) 1800.11 1807.45
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261063815? (TO) 1800.11 1808.05
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1063823? (TO) 1800.15 1816.98
galac E1063817Wrong Cert. 204.394 205.477
galac M1063816Wrong Cert. 931.325 940.363

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: