CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/primesDimacs/
normalized-f600.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/primesDimacs/
normalized-f600.xml
MD5SUM805ba8c659cc23c6689b984d920a9a3e
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables1200
Number of constraints3150
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3150
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_401050287? (TO) 1800.01 1812.03
bpsolver 2008-06-271050275? (TO) 1800.02 1816.41
Mistral-option 1.3141050280? (TO) 1800.02 1811.91
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301050269? (TO) 1800.03 1805.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301050268? (TO) 1800.03 1808.22
galac M1050278? (TO) 1800.04 1804.02
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271050271? (TO) 1800.05 1812.81
galac E1050279? (TO) 1800.06 1816.61
casper zito1050283? (TO) 1800.06 1811.81
MDG-probe 2008-06-271050270? (TO) 1800.07 1810.01
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261050277? (TO) 1800.07 1819.64
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104885? (TO) 1800.08 1808.41
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301050267? (TO) 1800.08 1802.32
casper zao1050282? (TO) 1800.08 1816.21
Mistral-prime 1.3131050281? (TO) 1800.09 1806.51
Abscon 112v4 AC1050284? (TO) 1800.1 1805.54
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261050276? (TO) 1800.1 1802.64
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131050272? (TO) 1800.1 1812.18
cpHydra k_101050286? (TO) 1800.1 1805.13
Sugar v1.13+minisat1050274? (TO) 1800.11 1807.82
Sugar v1.13+picosat1050273? (TO) 1800.12 1812.83
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1050285? (TO) 1800.18 1804.37

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: