CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/
primesDimacs/normalized-g-125-17.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/
primesDimacs/normalized-g-125-17.xml
MD5SUM28adb903193f339f0a75306072f25750
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables4250
Number of constraints68397
Maximum constraint arity17
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension68397
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301050164? (TO) 1800.02 1808.52
casper zito1050178? (TO) 1800.02 1802.62
galac M1050173? (TO) 1800.03 1802.31
Sugar v1.13+minisat1050169? (TO) 1800.03 1813.54
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104880? (TO) 1800.04 1811.41
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271050166? (TO) 1800.04 1817.02
Mistral-option 1.3141050175? (TO) 1800.04 1804.02
cpHydra k_101050181? (TO) 1800.04 1809.43
cpHydra k_401050182? (TO) 1800.05 1811.23
galac E1050174? (TO) 1800.05 1806.61
MDG-probe 2008-06-271050165? (TO) 1800.05 1806.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301050163? (TO) 1800.05 1800.82
Mistral-prime 1.3131050176? (TO) 1800.07 1809.42
bpsolver 2008-06-271050170? (TO) 1800.07 1814.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301050162? (TO) 1800.08 1804.03
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261050172? (TO) 1800.1 1809.67
casper zao1050177? (TO) 1800.11 1801.32
Sugar v1.13+picosat1050168? (TO) 1800.12 1801.83
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261050171? (TO) 1800.14 1813.08
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1050180? (TO) 1800.15 1811.08
Abscon 112v4 AC1050179? (TO) 1800.16 1816.15
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131050167? (TO) 1800.18 1804

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: