CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/fpga/
normalized-fpga-13-11.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/fpga/
normalized-fpga-13-11.xml
MD5SUM58cf1d19fb131499a4a83e5b8a8f7040
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.413936
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables215
Number of constraints178
Maximum constraint arity13
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension178
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
casper zito1062267SAT 0.413936 0.421089
casper zao1062266SAT 0.417935 0.424579
Mistral-option 1.3141062264SAT 0.509921 0.517679
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261062260SAT 1.05684 1.10267
Sugar v1.13+picosat1062257SAT 1.17282 1.24931
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301062253SAT 1.3348 1.38345
galac E1062263SAT 1.9397 2.07452
galac M1062262SAT 2.13967 2.22628
Abscon 112v4 AC1062268SAT 4.55631 4.59531
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1062269SAT 10.7274 10.8361
Sugar v1.13+minisat1062258SAT 54.3797 54.9481
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261062261SAT 281.34 284.023
bpsolver 2008-06-271062259SAT 896.141 900.293
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271062255? (TO) 1800.01 1808.81
Mistral-prime 1.3131062265? (TO) 1800.02 1807.31
cpHydra k_101062270? (TO) 1800.02 1805.13
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301062252? (TO) 1800.03 1800.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301062251? (TO) 1800.08 1814.02
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106324? (TO) 1800.08 1809.11
MDG-probe 2008-06-271062254? (TO) 1800.09 1814.01
cpHydra k_401062271? (TO) 1800.13 1819.02
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131062256? (TO) 1800.17 1806.65

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0