CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/chnl/
normalized-chnl-15-20.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/chnl/
normalized-chnl-15-20.xml
MD5SUMf4f50398b68b852815c7b3779f17aa15
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.436932
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables600
Number of constraints70
Maximum constraint arity20
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension70
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
casper zao1061069UNSAT 0.436932 0.440666
casper zito1061070UNSAT 0.45793 0.46846
Abscon 112v4 AC1061071UNSAT 1103 1106.14
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131061059? 213.121 212.879
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301061055? (TO) 1800.01 1805.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301061054? (TO) 1800.02 1820.82
Mistral-option 1.3141061067? (TO) 1800.02 1812.01
cpHydra k_101061073? (TO) 1800.04 1827.34
galac E1061066? (TO) 1800.04 1807.91
Sugar v1.13+picosat1061060? (TO) 1800.05 1807.72
cpHydra k_401061074? (TO) 1800.05 1807.84
Mistral-prime 1.3131061068? (TO) 1800.06 1802.11
bpsolver 2008-06-271061062? (TO) 1800.06 1809.11
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106307? (TO) 1800.07 1801.41
MDG-probe 2008-06-271061057? (TO) 1800.08 1800.81
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301061056? (TO) 1800.08 1806.22
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271061058? (TO) 1800.09 1810.21
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261061063? (TO) 1800.09 1809.15
galac M1061065? (TO) 1800.11 1808.91
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261061064? (TO) 1800.12 1820.74
Sugar v1.13+minisat1061061? (TO) 1800.13 1816.22
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1061072? (TO) 1800.17 1812.67

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: