CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-30-9-mod.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-30-9-mod.xml
MD5SUM50062f1989033f156236dffc97d03049
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.014997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints210
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size9
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension210
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271047984UNSAT 0.014997 0.0227599
Mistral-option 1.3141047993UNSAT 0.015997 0.023095
Mistral-prime 1.3131047994UNSAT 0.016997 0.022662
MDG-probe 2008-06-271047983UNSAT 0.017997 0.0230139
cpHydra k_101047999UNSAT 0.026995 0.034548
cpHydra k_401048000UNSAT 0.028994 0.0351491
bpsolver 2008-06-271047988UNSAT 0.075988 0.0810421
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261047990UNSAT 1.12483 1.14962
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261047989UNSAT 1.13783 1.15531
Sugar v1.13+minisat1047987UNSAT 2.51562 2.57232
Sugar v1.13+picosat1047986UNSAT 4.40233 4.47797
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104808UNSAT 9.65353 9.75653
Abscon 112v4 AC1047997UNSAT 142.409 143.521
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1047998UNSAT 154.915 156.279
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301047982UNSAT 157.677 159.094
galac M1047991UNSAT 193.522 193.689
casper zito1047996UNSAT 307.782 308.214
casper zao1047995UNSAT 354.139 355.53
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131047985UNSAT 379.171 381.724
galac E1047992UNSAT 614.607 620.451
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301047980? (TO) 1800.02 1815.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301047981? (TO) 1800.07 1808.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: